Distracted driving causes car accidents - crashes where people are seriously injured or killed. Deaths due to distracted driving are still being studied by academics and governmental agencies. All we know for sure is that texting or talking on the phone while driving is causing car accidents and crashes where people are dying - or suffering severe harm.
The American Journal of Public Health reports that "[d]istracted driving is a growing public safety hazard. Specifically, the dramatic rise in texting volume since 2005 [fatalities from distracted driving increased 28% from 2005 - 2008] appeared to be contributing to an alarming rise in distracted driving fatalities."
Laws are being enacted across the country to outlaw texting while driving and (better) using a phone at all while driving. According to the Department of Transportation, 30 states have outlawed texting for all drivers and another 8 states have outlawed drivers from using handheld cell phones while driving - period. (Most of these laws were passed in 2010.)
In Florida, Preemption Law prohibits localities from enacting distracted driving bans.
It's a celebrity issue. Oprah has a campaign against Distracted Driving (you've heard it: the No Phone Zone). Meanwhile, thumb (or surf) through any tabloid and see Kim Kardashian with her phone; Lindsey Lohan with her phone; Justin B. or Justin T. with his phone.
It's cool to text and talk.
It's convenient to do it while driving. And, face it: even if it's illegal, lots of folks are going to be doing it and it is very difficult for law enforcement to stop. Think about it -- it is not that easy to see what someone is doing as they drive along a busy street or freeway. That will be a true eagle eye that can spot the texter and then successfully prove in court that they are guilty of Distracted Driving. (Although the laws are helping some defendants by providing an "illegal acts" defense in any subsequent lawsuit.)
Which makes the recent development so interesting. Doctors have thrown themselves into this fracas.
The New England Journal of Medicine published an article on distracted driving this summer that included an opinion that doctors have a duty to warn their patients about the dangers of distracted driving. That's right: when Kim Kardashian goes to see her doctor, his peers are suggesting that he explain to Kim that driving while using the phone is very, very dangerous.
After this, one doctor-blogger responded to this NEJM report not with criticism that distracted driving might not be within the doctor's responsibilities but instead to point to a Virginia Tech study that suggests that distracted driving might not be all that bad (oh, please) and that heck, he rides his bike anyway. Wow.
Do Doctors Have a Duty to Warn About the Dangers of Distracted Driving?
Maybe so. Doctors are arguably voluntarily taking on the duty -- and therefore, possibly exposing themselves to the liability. Doctors are including distracted driving as a behavior that may lead to injury and therefore, something against which they have a duty to warn their patients.
DOCTORS are arguably defining the duty in of all places, the New England Journal of Medicine and based on the blogging physician, it's not being challenged within the profession itself. It's not legislatures or plaintiffs' lawyers trying to pin it on them here.
By on October 14, 2010 4:57 PM
No comments:
Post a Comment